Blog Layout

Which OSHA Standard Do You Dislike the Most?

It's a question that might raise a few eyebrows during a job interview, but one of the best Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Managers I know—and a dear friend—makes it a point to ask every candidate this very question. The responses? Always enlightening.


The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) was created with a noble goal: to ensure safe and healthful working conditions by setting and enforcing standards, and by providing training, outreach, education, and assistance. There’s no denying the vital role these standards have played in reducing workplace injuries and fatalities. However, as with any regulatory framework, the implementation in the real world can sometimes be a little less than ideal.


Good Intentions vs. Reality

OSHA standards are crafted with the best intentions, aimed at providing universal solutions in diverse industries. Yet, the practical application often reveals significant discrepancies between the theoretical safety standards and the on-ground realities faced by industries. This mismatch can lead to frustration among safety professionals who strive to maintain compliance while ensuring real workplace safety.


The Quirks of Interpretation

One of the main challenges with OSHA standards is their interpretation. The OSHA Letters of Interpretation are meant to clarify the standards, but they can sometimes complicate compliance efforts. These interpretations can vary significantly, leading to confusion among EHS professionals about the best course of action.


Inconsistency in Enforcement

Another pain point is the inconsistency in audit findings. Depending on the inspector and the region, the enforcement of the same standard can vary, making it difficult for businesses to predict how they should prepare for inspections. This inconsistency can be particularly challenging for companies that operate in multiple states or regions.


The Low-Hanging Fruit

Often, OSHA inspections focus on the most obvious breaches of safety standards—the "lowhanging fruit"—rather than delving into more complex issues that could have a profound impact on worker safety. This approach can sometimes result in superficial improvements that don't address the root causes of safety issues.


A Necessary Pillar of Workplace Safety

Despite these challenges, it is crucial to recognize that OSHA standards do make us better. They push companies to place worker safety at the forefront of their operations, fostering environments where health and safety are integral to organizational culture. Yes, OSHA inspectors are human too—they can be good, bad, or indifferent, depending on the day. Like any of us, they face pressures and challenges that can affect their performance and judgment.


Join the Conversation!

Now, I turn the question to you: Which OSHA standard do you dislike the most, and why? Email me your thoughts, and I will share the findings in our June blog. The best three submissions will receive prizes. While I'm still negotiating with our CFO on what those will be, I promise they will be worth your effort.


This conversation is not just about venting frustrations—it's about sharing experiences and insights that can lead to real improvements in how we approach workplace safety. Your input is invaluable, and together, we can continue to make our workplaces safer for everyone.


Looking forward to your responses!

Leave a comment

OSHA’s Top 10 Most Cited Health and Safety Violations of 2024 a Deeper Look!

By Derek Jennings • February 10, 2025
Each year, as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) releases its list of the top 10 workplace safety violations, a pattern emerges that begs a question: Are these frequent violations a sign that employers continue to struggle with the same safety issues, or does it reflect a disposition among OSHA inspectors to focus on areas where they are trained to focus? The Persistent Issue of Repeated Findings The repetition of certain violations year after year might seem surprising, but it underscores a significant challenge in workplace safety management. The top violations tend to be those that are most visible and easiest to spot during inspections, such as fall protection and hazard communication. This consistency suggests that while awareness is high, practical implementation and adherence to safety practices lag behind. Top 10 Most Cited Health and Safety Standards of 2024 1. . Fall Protection, General Requirements: 6,307 violations For the 14th consecutive year, fall protection tops the list of OSHA's enforcement priorities. This emphasis is not arbitrary; OSHA has designated fall protection as a national emphasis area, making it a primary focus during inspections. It's often one of the easiest violations to spot without extensive investigation skills. The OSHA standard 1926.501 mandates that employers must provide fall protection systems like guardrails, safety nets, or personal fall arrest systems for workers at risk of falls of six feet or more in construction and four feet in general industry. Often, the major factor in these violations is human behavior. Many offenders might think, "No one is watching, and this will only take a moment, so it's no big deal." However, this mindset can lead to non-compliance with critical safety measures, putting worker safety at significant risk.

Navigating OSHA's New Arc Flash Guidance - What Employers Need to Know

By Derek Jennings • February 7, 2025
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), in collaboration with the Partnership for Electrical Safety and KEMA Laboratories, has recently unveiled new guidance aimed at addressing arc flash hazards in the workplace. This guidance is a crucial update that highlights the need for comprehensive electrical safety programs that specifically include measures to protect against arc flash hazards. Here’s what employers need to understand about the new directives and how they can effectively respond. Understanding Arc Flash and OSHA's Recommendations An arc flash is a type of electrical explosion that results from a low-impedance connection to the ground or another voltage phase in an electrical system. The new guidance provided by OSHA not only offers a clear definition of what constitutes an arc flash but also elaborates on methods to mitigate such hazards during electrical work. The guidance includes detailed documents for employers and useful handouts for employees, emphasizing the common myths and the reality of arc flash dangers. The Role of NFPA 70E OSHA’s guidance strongly correlates with the standards outlined in NFPA 70E, the National Fire Protection Association’s standard for electrical safety in the workplace. Employers who are already compliant with NFPA 70E likely have a written Electrical Safety Program (ESP) that includes protocols for arc flash hazards. This new guidance serves to reinforce the importance of these existing standards while also urging those without comprehensive plans to take immediate action. What if You Don’t Have a Comprehensive ESP? For employers who have yet to develop an ESP that addresses arc flash hazards, OSHA’s guidance is a wake-up call. It is crucial to recognize that general workplace safety standards, although not specifying arc flash, require protection against electrical hazards under regulations like 1910.333. The absence of specific OSHA standards for arc flash does not excuse employers from the responsibility of protecting their employees from such risks. Implementing Effective Arc Flash Protection Measures Incident Energy Analysis: A foundational step in arc flash protection is conducting an incident energy analysis. This process involves studying the facility’s electrical systems to calculate the potential energy released in the event of an arc flash. Understanding this energy potential is essential for determining the arc flash boundary—the distance within which a person could receive second-degree burns or worse if exposed to an arc flash. Developing a Risk Assessment Procedure: Employ ers need to establish a procedure for assessing the risks associated with arc flash. This includes evaluating the tasks being performed, the condition of the electrical equipment, the maintenance history of the equipment, the energy involved, and the potentia l for human error. Deciding on Protective Measures: Once risks are assessed, decisions must be made regarding the best ways to protect employees. This often involves the use of Arc-Rated Pe rsonal Protective Equipment (PPE) and could also include engineering controls such as redesigning parts of the electrical system to minimize arc flash risks. Proactive Versus Reactive: The Choice is Yours The latest guidance from OSHA should be viewed as an unofficial yet critical call to action for employers to either update their existing safety measures or develop new protocols in line with NFPA 70E. Being proactive about electrical safety not only helps in compliance with OSHA’s standards but fundamentally enhances the safety and well-being of employees. Final Thoughts The introduction of OSHA’s arc flash guidance is a significant step toward heightened awareness and improved safety practices surrounding electrical hazards in the workplace. Employers are encouraged to review their current safety protocols, educate their workforce about the dangers of arc flash, and implement comprehensive measures to prevent such incidents. Always keep in mind that workplace safety begins with staying informed and well-prepared. Make it a habit to test before you touch it and prioritize safety like your life depended on it! For more insights into workplace safety and compliance, keep following our blog. Your safety is our priority, and together, we can foster a safer working environment for all. By Derek Jennings  President SEA

Navigating the Smoke: The Impact of Wildfires on Air Quality and Health Risks

By Derek Jennings • January 16, 2025
As wildfires continue to blaze across regions like Los Angeles, CA, they leave behind more than just scorched earth. The air quality in affected and surrounding areas deteriorates significantly, posing severe health risks to residents. Understanding the transformation of plant materials into char and ash during these fires, and the subsequent impact on our environment and health, is crucial for community safety and preparedness. The Science Behind the Smoke: Pyrolysis and Wildfires When wildfires burn through vegetation, the intense heat triggers a chemical process known as pyrolysis. This is where organic materials (like plants) break down under high temperatures in the absence of oxygen, transforming into various gases and liquids, and a solid residue rich in carbon, known as char. As the fire consumes more material, the process continues, leaving behind a substantial amount of ash, which consists mainly of inorganic substances. Both char and ash are significant byproducts of wildfires and contribute to the complex makeup of wildfire smoke. The Dangers of Char and Ash Air Quality Degradation: The small particles of char and ash produced during wildfires can become airborne and are small enough to be inhaled deeply into the lungs. They can travel vast distances, affecting air quality over broad areas. This particulate matter (PM) can penetrate indoor environments, making virtually no place safe from its reach. Health Implications: The health risks associated with poor air quality during and after a wildfire are significant. Inhalation of fine particulate matter from char and ash can lead to respiratory issues such as asthma attacks, bronchitis, and other chronic respiratory conditions. It can also exacerbate heart conditions, leading to increased hospital visits, and in severe cases, premature death. Vulnerable populations, including children, the elderly, and those with preexisting health conditions, are particularly at risk. Environmental Impact: Beyond human health, the environmental impact of char and ash is profound. These substances can contaminate water sources and soils, leading to long-term ecological damage and affecting the regrowth and recovery of natural habitats. Combustion Product Analysis: A Critical Need In the aftermath of a wildfire, analyzing the combustion products —char and ash—is essential to assess the environmental and health impact comprehensively. This analysis helps in understanding the specific contaminants released and assists in formulating strategies for cleanup and mitigation to prevent further harm to public health and the environment. Precautions and Recommendations Stay Informed: Keep track of air quality indexes (AQI) in your area through reliable sources to know when the air is unsafe. Limit Exposure: Avoid outdoor activities during high AQI levels. Keep windows and doors closed to minimize indoor air pollution. Use Air Purifiers: High-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) purifiers can help reduce indoor air particulate levels. Consult Health Professionals: If you experience any health issues related to air quality, consult medical professionals immediately. As communities near and far from the immediate blaze cope with the fallout of these devastating fires, understanding the complexities of wildfire smoke, specifically the roles of char and ash, becomes paramount. By staying informed and prepared, individuals and communities can better protect themselves from the less visible, but equally dangerous, aspects of wildfires. By Derek Jennings, President SEA
Show More
Share by: